The conduct of the veterinarian must be evaluated according to the parameters MEDIA CARE - CARE - REPORT.
The responsibility has its basis in the element of fault intended as psychological participation in negligent conduct.
In criminal cases, the behavior of the veterinarian can be penalized by these articles:
art.43 CP - (mental element of crime)
art.51 - (exercise of any right or fulfillment of a duty)
art.638 - (killing animals and damage to others)
art.727 (cruelty to animals )
art.373-(false expert opinion or interpretation)
art.365 - (failure to report)
art.481 - (false ideological certificates)
The veterinary profession is also considered necessary public
Blame
The fault exists whenever there is negligence - malpractice - Failure - imprudence.
The veterinarian is held accountable for negligence, when faced with a case of normal or regular work or has acted in contravention of the principle of diligence and JOINT MEDIA TRAINING. (art.1176 cc)
In the event of litigation before the court, the verdict on the degree of guilt is not for the expert but the court, which will use a technical consultant.
will therefore be the victim to prove the link between damage and the harmful event and negligent conduct of the veterinarian.
It 'so good in cases of death of the suspected error for therapeutic, diagnostic, instrumental or technical, or in case of wrongful death, to perform an autopsy on an approved (or Zooprofilattico University)
fundamental importance is the technical advice of another vet that will check how time and nature of damage and whether the event is attributed to the veterinarian accused is caused by negligent conduct business or competing with contributing factors this. The "evidence" can be given by any certification (reports, analysis, X-rays, sonograms, prescriptions and receipts) related to the challenged action related to job performance.
0 comments:
Post a Comment